Acute Coronary Syndrome: the Unmet Need

ACS: a Worldwide Killer

Acute Coronary Syndrome (ACS) is a major public health concern and claims millions of lives worldwide each year. In the United States, ACS will affect approximately 1.5 million people annually1 and almost a quarter of a million deaths occur annually in the EU as a result of coronary artery disease.2 Emergency room doctors, physicians and cardiologists will see countless cases of ACS in their respective careers, and according to the latest statistics published by the American Heart Association, ACS was responsible for over a million hospital admissions in the U.S. in 2009.1

The Unmet Need In ACS (Residual Risk)

Of significant concern, are the high incidence and mortality rates of a subsequent cardiovascular

event occurring after leaving the hospital. According to data from the GRACE registry, 68-97% of deaths in ACS patients occur after hospital discharge.3

Antiplatelet therapy has been the mainstay of secondary prevention in ACS for the last 2 decades. The Antiplatelet Trialists Collaboration conducted a review of antiplatelet therapy in 1994.4 It was shown that antiplatelet therapy reduced vascular events by approximately 25%. However, the percentage of patients on ASA alone going on to suffer a vascular event was still fairly high. Almost ten years later, the Antithrombotic Trialists Collaboration conducted a larger review of 287 antiplatelet studies.5 Again, antiplatelet therapy reduced the outcome of vascular events by approximately one quarter, but the amount of

Acute Coronary Syndrome: the Unmet Need

patients on antiplatelet therapy experiencing vascular events was still substantial, at approximately 15%.

These days, therapy for ACS prevention most commonly consists of dual antiplatelet therapy with ASA and clopidogrel.6 However, the rate of subsequent events remains high. Most recently, the field has witnessed the development of novel antiplatelet agents that may replace clopidogrel. Two recent trials analysed the overall rate of major cardiovascular events for patients on ASA and clopidogrel compared to novel antiplatelet agents.7, 8 The results showed the overall rate for ASA plus clopidogrel was approximately 12%. Despite improved outcomes with the newer agents, the number of serious vascular events was approximately 10%.

This illustrates that residual risk for CV events remains high in such patients.

Thus, while antiplatelet therapy is the cornerstone of treatment to prevent recurrent ACS events, overall approximately 1 in 10 patients with ACS will have another major cardiovascular incident within one year after the index event.4, 5, 7, 8 Due to the fact that ACS is such a significant public health issue, and the rates of subsequent events remains fairly high despite current treatment strategies, additional approaches to further reduce complications and enhance secondary prevention efforts are needed.

Reference List

  1. Roger VL, Go AS, Lloyd-Jones DM et al. Heart disease and stroke statistics--2012 update: a report from the American Heart Association. Circulation 2012;125(1):e2-e220. PMID: 22179539

  2. European Heart Network. European Cardiovascular Disease Statistics 2008. http://www.ehnheart.org/cvd-statistics.html . 2008.

  3. Fox KA, Carruthers KF, Dunbar DR et al. Underestimated and under-recognized: the late consequences of acute coronary syndrome (GRACE UK-Belgian Study). Eur Heart J 2010;31(22):2755-64. PMID: 20805110

  4. Collaborative overview of randomised trials of antiplatelet therapy--I: Prevention of death, myocardial infarction, and stroke by prolonged antiplatelet therapy in various categories of patients. Antiplatelet Trialists' Collaboration. BMJ 1994;308(6921):81-106. PMID: 8298418

  5. Antithrombotic Trialists' Collaboration. Collaborative meta-analysis of randomised trials of antiplatelet therapy for prevention of death, myocardial infarction, and stroke in high risk patients. BMJ 2002;324(7329):71-86. PMID: 11786451

  6. Roe MT, Messenger JC , Weintraub WS et al. Treatments, trends, and outcomes of acute myocardial infarction and percutaneous coronary intervention. J Am Coll Cardiol 2010;56(4):254-63. PMID: 20633817

  1. Wallentin L, Becker RC, Budaj A et al. Ticagrelor versus clopidogrel in patients with acute coronary syndromes. N Engl J Med 2009;361(11):1045-57. PMID: 19717846

  2. Wiviott SD, Braunwald E, McCabe CH et al. Prasugrel versus clopidogrel in patients with acute coronary syndromes. N Engl J Med 2007;357(20):2001-15. PMID: 17982182

Featured In Next Issue

  • Exploring the Dual Pathway in
    Acute Coronary Syndrome
  • Laboratory Testing of
    Anticoagulants
  • Cardiovascular Comorbidities
    in Patients with AF
SUBSCRIBE! Receive and email alert when
Issue 3 is available